LET 'S MAKE A STAND FOR PRESIDENT BUSH

If you're going to defend our current President, you could at least spell his name correctly. :-P

Followups.

[rest snipped]

I spelt it the way President Georges W. Bush spells it at time, and this is the French way !

That is a 'clin d'oeil ' from the Greatest and most certainly one of the Bravest President the United States of America in the whole America's History ! ... and who you are most fortunate to have during those uncertain times !

President Georges Bush is quite aware of what is owed to Lafayette 's memory, and has great respect for that great man, who loved America so much indeed ! Hence his way to sign when writing at time to some French gentleman !

Further, as you may not known, Président Georges W. Bush is an expert in History, and quite aware that Columbus NEVER discovered America !

Indeed such credit must be rendered to the Ecossais, and in clear to Prince Henri Sinclair, Lord of Argyll ! ... and this known by all True Celts !

By the way, the True Geology is dedicated to both President Georges Bush and Sire Tony Blair d'Angleterre ! Dedicated to Celtic Knights of the present Modern World, and my greatest hope is that the True Geology will be taught both at Oxford and at the MIT soon !

This post has arrived on Usenet from a bizarre mirror universe.

Which left:

he's having enough trouble as it is, i don't think an endorsement from a loon is going to help any.

the terror war is not a war against islam. in case you haven't noticed, its leading to the secularization of islamic ethics.

are you insane? he doesn't spell it georges, and if he spelt it the french way people think he was a poof.

uhmm, i bet TR was braver

yeah, lafayette, thanks a bunch for that. von steuben was a more pragmatic help.

how the hell would you know how bush signs his name.

everyone is aware that columbous didn't reach the mainland. thats why its america, not columbia.

why you think you have any idea what bush knows is beyond me. how would you know then, you're no a celt.

ok, someone needs to go find out who georges bush is, perhaps he's the president of some french company.

as for blaire, he isn't even a knight, let alone a sire.

really, what makes you think that there is any meaning in your pretending that he is a Sire?

your dedication is pretty meaningless. you're a nobody, and no one cares what you dedicate or to whom you dedicate it. There are no celtic knights, and even if there were, you would not be one of them, if for no other reason than not being a celt yourself.

you're a complete fool. people have asked you repeatedly to give some demonstrations of this true geology, but you have failed. they have asked you for questions it should answer, and you have none. you have said that you only know it because of years of detailed real world study, which sounds more like the foolish gibbering of an unstable mentality. all your sentence aboev means is that you wish and hope that one day you will be a teacher at 'big' schools, like oxford or mit, since you can't teach this 'true geology' to anyone.

you made this up, you gave yourself this title. do you think that there is some world where this isn't pathetic?

again, this is not a celtic name.

and you live in australia because....?

of what? what company are you the senior geologist of?

making more stuff up.

you haven't presented any original ideas yet.

Interesting reply from a most stupid and ignorant fool, which I am sure deserve fully _ and probably he will confirm it _ the epithet of Glaaaaciations Beuuuuuuulievers ! Let 's see ! another comments in the text.

[SNIP]

I also think that he is not mentally quite all there

You are avoiding answering on the content, Doug.... as well as Tom !

Probably like in True Geological issues, it is going above your head.

Never mind !

<snip> <this seems to have stopped being about Bush>

Jean Paul,

You cannot expect anyone to understand your theory if you don't present it. If you don't present it, but rail against mainstream scientists (among others), then you are not making it possible to evaluate your theories, even for those who might find your ideas intriguing. I think you are putting off a full, adequate evaluation of your theory.

Jean Paul, I live in Wisconsin. There is a vast number of different land-forms and geology in Wisconsin that are well explained by mainstream geology, including glaciations. If you wish to challenge or change mainstream geological thinking, Occam's Razor and scientific method requires that you provide alternative theories that explain the evidence as well as, or better than, the current theories. If you can do that, and refuse to, then you can hardly complain