My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
dtilque
Expert Boarder
Posts: 86
graphgraph
User Offline
 
I know its relatively off topic for the paleo group especially, but, isn't it just interesting when an idea in one science is shared in another. i dont mean to imply that the author below is an authority, but the resemblence between the his grouping and cladistics is, well, interesting if nothing else.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
sallan
Senior Boarder
Posts: 73
graphgraph
User Offline
 
There's a long history of comparing language phylogeny with biological phylogeny, and importing the methods of the second into the first. Most historical linguists don't seem to like it. I like to think that they're about 50 years behind biological systematics in most of their thinking. They haven't been through the cladistic revolution yet, but perhaps eventually they will. A common theme in systematics, pre-cladistics, was despair at making sense of phylogeny.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
gsbisht1
Expert Boarder
Posts: 88
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Darwin's theory of Natural Selection is often crossed over into economic theory.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
dgatlin
Senior Boarder
Posts: 77
graphgraph
User Offline
 
wasn't the original cross over the other way around? Darwin read and agreed with much of 'Wealth of Nations', at least the logic of
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Nov 2008 Dinosaur Home