Ask A Question
 
rohan_morajkar
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 13
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 10 Months ago #1
In the history of life, when did the Mammal-like-Reptiles live? _If_ I remember correctly, cladist represent them as ancestor to mammals, yet they are found in strata that is older dinosaurs.

What are the facts concerning these animals?

H. Robert Dean
davidm
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 21
Rating: 1ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 10 Months ago #2
Cladists don't call them 'mammal-like reptiles', since they don't belong to Clade _Reptilia_. A more accurate term would be 'non-mammalian synapsids'.

The first synapsid existed well before the first dinosaur, during the Pennsylvanian Age. One synapsid clade, _Therapsida_, replaced other synapsids during the Permian. Most types of therapsid died out by the end of the Triassic
Juikiters
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 17
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 10 Months ago #3
The mammal-like reptiles first appeared in the permain, along with the thecodonts (dinosaur ancestors). Dinosaurs and Mammals more or less
rohandsa
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 16
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 10 Months ago #4
The term 'thecodont' as meaning any non-dinosaurian, non-pterosaurian, non-crocodyliform archosauromorph is falling into disuse. Instead of just being 'dinosaur ancestors', this is a highly diverse group of archosauromorphs that really doesn't have any uniting features, and hence is not a particularly useful group.

'Thecodont' is still used to describe a dental condition, though.
dsojda
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 10
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 10 Months ago #5
I realize that 'dinosaur ancestors' doesn't nearly do the thecodonts justice, but I was trying to keep thing simple.

Incidently, I was under the impression that crocodylians were considered a type of thecodont, rather than as a separate group (like Dinosaurs and Pterosaurs). E.g., not a group derrived from thecodonts, but a group that retains (almost?) every characteristic of their thecodont ancestors with little-to-no derrived characteristics...
sallan
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 18
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 10 Months ago #6
Were the synodonts marsupial type mammals?

Bob Dean
Rolf Guthmann
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 16
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 10 Months ago #7
Crocodylians are actually fairly derived in some ways. They have a complex heart structure, although it's currently impossible to know how far down the line that trait extends.

But, as I said, the taxon Thecodontia is a rather outdated concept, and falling from use. There is no trait which unites them
Administrator
Administrator
Raptor Lewis
Blog Posts: 6
Forum Posts: 384
Rating: 18ApplaudCriticize
Posted 7 Months, 3 Weeks ago #8
sallan wrote:
Were the synodonts marsupial type mammals?

Bob Dean


That is a difficult question to answer as soft tissue doesn't commonly fossilze. However, let me correct a few things:

1. Cynodonts are a group of "non-mammalian synapsids," and not TRUE mammals. (Synapsids is term that usually refers to mammals, yet, as in this case, refers to Cynodonts as well.)

2. These animals were more of a transition between the Reptilia and Mammalia Classes.


Basically, there is NO evidence of marsupial characteristics among this group.

Hope this helps...though I hope I didn't get TOO technical...
Raptor Lewis
Forum Administrator
The Content on this site is provided for general information purposes only. Your use of the Content, or any part thereof, is made solely at Your own risk and responsibility. By entering this site you declare you read and agreed to its Terms, Rules & Privacy.
Copyright © 2006 - 2010 Dinosaur Home