My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 2 Weeks, 2 Days ago
bluebonics
Senior Boarder
Posts: 77
graphgraph
User Offline
 
[Donald]

[hanson] Thanks, guys. Now, what interests me are the developments that *preceded* the invocations of the KNO3/C/S mixes but which led up to it. To mind comes the concept that James Burke used in his PBS/BBC TV production 'Connections'.

We discussed a while back in sci.chem a similar topic with KNO3's origin being the issue, via Ca(NO3)2 + 2 K2CO3
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Weeks, 2 Days ago
UGybeRty
Expert Boarder
Posts: 82
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Please remove sci.bio.paleontology from this very OT thread.

Regards,

Edward Hennessey
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Weeks, 1 Day ago
hcg88b
Senior Boarder
Posts: 70
graphgraph
User Offline
 
pardon my uneducated guess.... but it seems to me that if archaeology is a goofed up as it is, that alchemy may be a younger science than we think...and second of all...since when did the Chinese invent something that worked?

I read somewhere that a couple of old moonshiners were making slop out of a mixture of grains and corns, when an Indian came by and told them that sulfur from the Yellowstone region would help the stink. They inadvertently dug some of the coals from the fire and mixed it in the pile of slop, the combination was quite volitile and led to a sever case of the runs. They decided to take up alchemy and invented gunpowder.....up until then, the stuff they used in guns was a combination of highly distilled alcohol in a ground corn husk mash that was put down the barrel wet and ignited using a squirt of raw spirits......
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Nov 2008 Dinosaur Home