Ask A Question
 
TJW1226
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 6
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
I have been collecting fossils for a few years locally. My locality is void of any substantial fossils from the dinosaur period, due to the ice ages and their resultant extensive erosion. It is, however, richly strewn with fossil specimens from the Devonian/Silurian/Ordovican periods, possibly even much earlier periods. Lots of shale, slate, some limestone, mudstone layers. Some road cuts expose up to 100 feet of these layers.

Anyway, I came across these two strange rocks; I will refrain from calling them fossils for now. I was highly intrigued by them. I realize identification by mere photograph is difficult, perhaps someone could help me identify them.
Answer
TJW1226
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 6
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
1 of 4
Answer
TJW1226
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 6
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
2 of 4
Answer
TJW1226
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 6
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
3 of 4
Answer
TJW1226
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 6
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
4 of 4
Answer
Ace
tyler keenan
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 628
Rating: 30ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
those are trace fossils, well thats what they look like to me
Answer
Gold Boarder
copper
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 198
Rating: 12ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
Yup, those are trace fossils. I think so as well.
Answer
TJW1226
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 6
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
I would guess that the first one is the remains of a fish or amphibian. It was too large to take home. I haven't a clue as to what the other is. Never seen anything like them in the field.
Answer
Si02
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 25
Rating: 2ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
TJW1226 wrote:
3 of 4


My guess would be the brachiopod genus lingula.
Answer
Silver Border
whalesend
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 103
Rating: 10ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
could the top picture specimen be an eel instead of fish?
Answer
Si02
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 25
Rating: 2ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
I don't think it could be an eel. Eels didn't evolve until the cretaceous, and upstate NY has much older sediment.

But as to what it really is, I am stumped.
Answer
Silver Border
whalesend
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 103
Rating: 10ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
There looks like a rib cage...maybe a juvenile snake.
Answer
Ace
tyler keenan
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 628
Rating: 30ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
it almost looks like a leach (the first pic)
Answer
Si02
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 25
Rating: 2ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
I don't think it's any kind of animal remains. Snakes also hadn't evolved yet And I am unsure if leeches are present in the fossil record because they are soft bodied.

Maybe it is a trace fossil like everyone said before?
Answer
Ace
tyler keenan
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 628
Rating: 30ApplaudCriticize
Posted 1 Year, 1 Month ago Linkback
yeah. im not the trace fossil expert lol i just know what they look like!
Answer

Spread the Word!

Four out of five users would recommend us to a friend. Shouldn't you?
Link to Us    Tell a Friend

Related Posts:

The Content on this site is provided for general information purposes only. Your use of the Content, or any part thereof, is made solely at Your own risk and responsibility. By entering this site you declare you read and agreed to its Terms, Rules & Privacy.
Copyright © 2006 - 2010 Dinosaur Home